Pageviews past week

Thursday, October 14, 2010

If you haven't read Stanley Fish's attack on U Albany in a recent NYT article, it is worth reading. I've put the article up on my Ed line page for all to read. I've also included Matthew Arnold on "The best which has been thought and said." Here is an excerpt:

There is a view [of culture] in which all the love of our neighbour, the impulses towards action, help, and beneficence, the desire for stopping human error, clearing human confusion, and diminishing the sum of human misery, the noble aspiration to leave the world better and happier than we found it—motives eminently such as are called social—come in as part of the grounds of culture, and the main and pre-eminent part. Culture is then properly described … as having its origin in the love of perfection; it is a study of perfection …


Then try Fish... He is far from a Victorian idealist. In fact, he is irritating in his pragmatic take:

It’s not their job to value the humanities or even to understand them. But it is the job of presidents and chancellors to proclaim the value of liberal arts education loudly and often and at least try to make the powers that be understand what is being lost when traditions of culture and art that have been vital for hundreds and even thousands of years disappear from the academic scene. President Philip cries crocodile tears. Real tears are in order.


Hear any echoes of Arnold on the shores of the Agean?

The Sea of Faith
Was once, too, at the full, and round earth's shore
Lay like the folds of a bright girdle furled.
But now I only hear
Its melancholy, long, withdrawing roar,
Retreating, to the breath
Of the night-wind, down the vast edges drear
And naked shingles of the world.


Ah, love, let us be true
To one another! for the world, which seems
To lie before us like a land of dreams,
So various, so beautiful, so new,
Hath really neither joy, nor love, nor light,
Nor certitude, nor peace, nor help for pain;
And we are here as on a darkling plain
Swept with confused alarms of struggle and flight,
Where ignorant armies clash by night.

Monday, October 4, 2010

Voting them in

I've heard a great deal lately about voting people out. Those who hold these signs, shaking them in our faces, seem like very angry people. Those who repeat the mantra in less angry tones say things like, well, I really don't know what else to do.

I would suggest something as equally absurd as simply voting for anyone except incumbents. Vote only for incumbents. Absurd? Of course it is. Voting for someone who has been in office for years simply because you are familiar with the guy is no reason to vote for him. Doesn't the guy's voting record matter? Of course it does.

By the same token, newcomers need to be checked out. Would you buy a new car this way? Would you become so angry with your old car that you just said, forget it, I'm just buying a car- I don't care what it looks like or how it drives!

If you can't take the time to look into who you're voting for. Stay home. Watch another episode of Jersey Shore. I was going to make a pun on the Situation, but it just doesn't seem worth it.